Monday, November 16, 2015

A Short History of the Verein für Raumschiffahrt

          Chuck Black

The Curator Emeritus of the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum has added to the history surrounding a small, amateur rocketry association, called the Verein für Raumschiffahrt (VfR) and based in Germany prior to World War II, which played a pivotal role in the launching of our first great space age.

Members of the Verein für Raumschiffahrt (VfR) on April 11th April 1930 in Berlin. Beginning on the left, the image shows Johannes Winkler, Willy Ley, an unidentified person (initially identified by Ley as Wernher von Braun, although the likeness bears little resemblance to known photos of von Braun during this period)), Rudolf Nebel, Max Valier and Erich Wurm. Frequently attributed to Spring 1931, the image was actually taken in April 1930 at an event which Ley described in his book "Rockets, Missiles and Space Travel." Valier was killed in a rocket explosion in May 1930, just days after this photo was taken. Behind the group can be seen a mock-up of a large Oberth rocket which is hanging from the ceiling on a parachute.  Photo c/o The Space Library.

Frank H. Winter, who retired as Smithsonian curator of rocketry in 2007, has just completed a paper on the association, under the title "The German Rocket Society." The paper is currently available online for download on The Space Library.

Frank Winter. Photo c/o Frank Winter. 
Winter takes pains to note that the historical German name for the organization, translates into English as the "Society for Spaceship Travel" or more rarely, the "German Interplanetary Society."

"It was never called the 'German Rocket Society,' or any variation of that name, at least in Germany," said Winter during a recent interview. "The members didn't even do much rocketry until half way through the VfR's existence."

That existence spanned only seven years, from 1927 until 1934, although the legacy of the organization was carried out throughout the war years and led directly to the postwar contributions of German scientists to the American Redstone missile and Apollo programs.

Of course, Winter has written about German rocketry before. His 1983 book, "Prelude to the Space Age: The Rocket Societies 1924-1940" (Smithsonian Institution Press, 1983), went into substantial detail on the VfR and became the gold standard for research in this area over the last 30 years.

Even Willy Ley, who may (or may not) have been a founding member of the VfR (he said he was), wrote in his 1957 book, "Rockets, Missiles and Space Travel," about the formative effect the VfR had on his efforts and the efforts of others.


Please Consider Subscribing to The Space Library.



For only $5 dollars a month, you get access to 30,000+ pages of space information and papers, including "The German Rocket Society" by Frank Winter and hundreds of hours of audio and video.

Your contributions help to support new research and the maintenance of the existing repository.


Join The Space Library Today!



So why did Winter decide to revisit this well-tread historical path? That's an easy question to answer.
The VfR was the largest and most prominent association of that period and much new information on their activities has recently come to light...  
Writing a new paper for the Space Library is a marvelous way to promote these new finds and also to help promote some of the other unique documents and source materials already preserved in the Space Library.
Among those unique documents are scans of every issue of "Die Rakete," the official publication of the VfR. Highlights from its first year of publication (1927) include articles on theoretical questions related to the best launch trajectories and times for trips to the Moon, Mars and other planets, radio communications between the Earth and Mars and a long article discussing Einstein's theory of relativity.

Chuck Black.
For more information on Frank Winter's latest contribution to the Space Library or to learn more about the repository, please click on the link above.
___________________________________________________________

Chuck Black is the editor of the Commercial Space blog.

Sunday, November 15, 2015

One Shoe Has Dropped for Canadian Space; Will the Other Shoe Drop Next Week?

          By Glen Strom

Minister Bains. Photo c/o @NavdeepSBains.
The first shoe dropped. Now we know who’ll be in charge of the Canadian Space Agency (CSA).

As predicted in the November 8th, 2015 article, “A New Era for Canadian Space or More of the Same?”, Navdeep Bains, Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development is the CSA’s new boss. The “Our Minister” link at the bottom of the CSA’s website leads to Mr. Bains’ government profile.

Maybe, just maybe, the other shoe might drop next week. We might find out what the government has in mind for the Canadian space industry.

Mr. Bains is scheduled to speak at the 2015 Canadian Aerospace Summit in Ottawa on November 18th. This conference, hosted by the Aerospace Industries Association of Canada (AIAC), is billed as a meeting for “primarily C-suite executives and government officials.”

Space makes up a small part of the aerospace market for Canada, so it may not be a major topic here.

Not unless one of the spacier attendees, like UrtheCast President Wade Larson, gets Mr. Bains in a verbal headlock and whispers in his ear about the joys of commerce in a galaxy far away.

CSA president Laporte. Photo c/o CSA.
Headlocks, verbal or otherwise, won’t be needed to get people talking about space at another conference that starts on November 19th in Vancouver. CSA President Sylvain Laporte will speak at the Canadian Space Summit, the yearly event put on by the Canadian Space Society (CSS).

It’s all space here—that’s what the CSS is about. Maybe Mr. Laporte will have something to say about the future of the space industry and the CSA.

Even if not much is revealed at either conference, there’s still reason to be optimistic about greater government support for Canadian space, and the hint comes from an unexpected source.

The government did something unusual. They released the ministerial mandate letters for all of the ministers to the public, something that observers say has never been done before by a federal government in Canada.

The letters for Mr. Bains, the minister in charge, and the other two ministers working with him, Minister of Science Kirsty Duncan and Minister of Small Business and Tourism Bardish Chagger, don’t give a lot of detail, but one of the three letters could be significant for the space industry.

Ms. Chagger's letter shows that she will take a support role with Mr. Bains and other ministers in promoting small business and tourism.

Ms. Duncan’s letter outlines that she is in charge of strengthening scientific research and development. She’ll create a position called Chief Science Officer to ensure that scientists are able to speak freely to journalists and the public about their work.

Ms. Duncan will also assist the minister of employment, workforce development and labour to create more co-op places for STEM students, and work with other ministries on bringing science-based evidence back into environmental assessments.


Mr. Bains’ letter is the one that could have implications for the space industry. It says he is to develop an innovation agenda that will expand “effective support for incubators, accelerators, the emerging national network for business innovation and cluster support, and the Industrial Research Assistance Program.” (Note that the Industrial Research Assistance Program (IRAP) is designed to help “accelerate the growth of your business through innovation and technology.”)

The directive goes on to say that “...These investments will target key growth sectors where Canada has the ability to attract investment or grow export-oriented companies.”

That sounds like it should include the space industry, doesn’t it? Maybe that innovation agenda is something Mr. Bains will expand on at the AIAC conference.

Glen Strom.
So now we wait and see if that other shoe hits the ground. Those of you who’ll be in Ottawa or Vancouver next week may be in the best position to hear a thump.
_____________________________________________________

Glen Strom is a freelance writer and editor with a background in business and technical writing. Follow him on Twitter @stromspace for the latest on Canadian space stories.

Sunday, November 08, 2015

A New Era for Canadian Space or More of the Same?

          By Glen Strom

Sometimes you get what you want. Or so it seems. The newly elected Federal government hasn’t said who will have responsibility for space, but what used to be Industry Canada would be a logical choice.

Yes, past tense for Industry Canada.

The newly minted Innovation Minister Bains at a press conference on Parliament Hill on November 6th. As outlined in the November 6th, 2015 Huffington Post article, "Liberals Unmuzzle Canadian Scientists, Promise They Can Now 'Speak Freely,'" he was fulfilling a Liberal party campaign promise to allow government scientists and experts to speak freely about their work to the media and the public. Photo c/o Adrian Wyld/CP.

The incoming Liberal's  have decided to turn it into a super-ministry, an idea that the Canadian Advanced Technology Alliance (CATA) promoted. Industry Canada will now be the Ministry of Innovation, Science and Economic Development.

CATA, which bills itself as the largest high-tech association in Canada, stated their position in an October 16th, 2015 press release with the windy title, “Major Industry Group calls for elected government to consolidate current Minister of State (Science and Technology) and Minister of Industry positions into Minister of Science, Technology and Business Innovation.”

A new ministry with three new ministers. Graphic c/o Wikipedia.
CATA believed that a “newly refocused department would send a message that the federal government is serious about making business innovation the keystone of its economic policies.”

The association was clearly pleased by the government’s response, as shown by their November 4th, 2015 CATA press release, "New Innovation, Science and Economic Development Ministry Announced: CATAAlliance Applauds Positive Pivot to the Future."

The head of the super-ministry is Navdeep Singh Bains. Mr. Bains previously served in parliament in the Paul Martin Liberal government, and later as a member of the opposition. He temporarily lost his seat in the 2011 election to Conservative Eve Adams.

Mr. Bains is a Certified Management Accountant (CMA). He was also a distinguished visiting professor at Ryerson University’s Ted Rogers School of Management in Toronto.

People in the automotive industry are enthusiastic about his appointment to this ministry, as outlined in a November 4th, 2015 article at the Windsor Star, “High hopes for new federal minister in charge of auto industry.” Mr. Bains worked as an accountant and financial analyst for the Ford Motor Company for several years.

Even if it turns out that Mr. Bains isn’t in charge of space, just substitute the name of the minister who will be. The following questions won’t change.

Right now, everything is up in the air (no pun intended) until the new government starts to make its mark, or perhaps leave a mark, depending on what it does.

The first test may come sooner than expected with a potential hot potato. Last week, Cambridge, Ontario based COM DEV International was sold to Honeywell International Inc., as reported in the November 7th, 2015 post, “Will the proposed COM DEV sale to US based Honeywell trigger the Investment Canada Act?”

How will the new minister deal with this one?

Minister of Science Kirsty Duncan and Minister of Small Business and Tourism Bardish Chagger. Will either of them be saddled with the responsibility of supervising the CSA? Photo's c/o Celebrity Speakers Bureau &  the Liberal Party of Canada.

And what about the red-headed stepchild, the Canadian Space Agency (CSA)? Will the CSA get a clear mandate, proper funding, a long-range plan, and the independence to execute that plan without politicians meddling in the day-to-day affairs?

Or will the agency continue to meander, doing not much more than acting like the vice-principal of a high school making sternly-worded phone calls to miscreants who step over the party line?

How different will the new minister be from his predecessor at Industry Canada, James Moore? Will he be the new sheriff in town, or will it be meet the new boss, same as the old boss?

Glen Strom.
CATA says they got what they wanted. Will the space industry?

Considering how many promises the Liberals made during the election and the major issues, and high expectations, facing their new government, we’ll likely find out sooner than later.
_____________________________________________________

Glen Strom is a freelance writer and editor with a background in business and technical writing. Follow him on Twitter @stromspace for the latest on Canadian space stories.

Saturday, November 07, 2015

Should the proposed COM DEV sale to US based Honeywell trigger the Investment Canada Act?

          By Chuck Black

It's official. US based Honeywell International, a Fortune 100 conglomerate that produces a variety of commercial and consumer products, services and systems for private consumers, major corporations and governments, has offered to purchase Cambridge, Ontario based COM DEV International, one of the three largest Canadian space companies, for what is generally estimated to be $455Mln CDN.

But that total doesn't include the expected proceeds to shareholders from the public offering for exactEarth - a COM DEV subsidiary - which could potentially add enough to the deal to drive it past the $600Mln CDN total needed to trigger a Federal government review under the Investment Canada Act (ICA).

The 2014 COM DEV annual financial report. According to the company website, "COM DEV manufactures advanced technologies and subsystems which are sold to major spacecraft builders and space agencies worldwide for use in communications, space science, and remote sensing. Our technology is used on more than 950 spacecraft to date, including 80 percent of all commercial communications satellites ever launched. In addition, through recent acquisitions we are taking our core expertise in RF/microwave engineering into non-space niches where customers value premium RF performance and high reliability in harsh environments." As outlined in the January 15th, 2015 press release, "COM DEV Announces Fourth Quarter and Year-End Fiscal 2014 Results," total fiscal year 2014 revenue was $208.2Mln CDN, down 3.4% from fiscal 2013, largely as a result of continued U.S. government spending constraints. But revenue in the commercial equipment sector increased year over year by 26.5% to $137.4Mln CDN from $108.6Mln CDN during the same period.  The company employs  1,250 people in Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States, India and China. Graphic c/o COM DEV.

As outlined in the November 5th, 2015 COM DEV press release, "COM DEV announces acquisition by Honeywell and spinout of exactEarth," the real offer on the table is as follows:
  • COM DEV shareholders will receive up to $5.25 CDN in cash per share of COM DEV they currently own (for an estimated total value of $455Mln CDN), plus 0.1977 of a share of exactEarth Ltd., for an aggregate implied transaction value of up to $6.54 CDN for each COM DEV share.
  • exactEarth Ltd. will become a standalone public company.
An aggregate implied transaction value for the total sale (including the exactEarth shares) at a price of $6.54 implies a total valuation of approximately $580Mln CDN (with approximately $125Mln CDN of the total attributable to exactEarth shares), which is just under the current $600Mln CDN "threshold for review" as listed on the ICA webpage.

However, at least until the latest announcement was made this week, the estimates of potential exactEarth value have generally been far higher.

And, as outlined in the November 6th, 2015 CanTech Letter post, "Honeywell acquisition is no slam dunk for Com Dev shareholders, says Paradigm," the implied transaction value for exactEarth has always been flexible and subject to the vagaries of the marketplace.


The article quoted Paradigm Capital analyst Daniel Kim as stating that the current $125Mln CDN valuation for exactEarth in the latest offering is "far below" the previously floated IPO range of from $157Mln to $187Mln CDN for the company.

Kim also confirmed a much higher potential value for a stand-alone exactEarth, and thinks the Honeywell offer provides a “huge” potential upside for the educated investor.

A valuation of even $157Mln CDN for exactEarth, when added to the Honeywell valuation of $455Mln CDN for COM DEV would place the total value of the deal at $612Mln CDN, well over the $600Mln CDN required to trigger a Federal government review under the ICA.

Even the valuation of COM DEV alone could be problematic from the ICA perspective. As per the November 8th, 2015 Space News article, "Honeywell To Acquire Component Maker Com Dev," Com Dev has invested in positioning itself for expected, but not yet closed, business from the upcoming 900 satellite OneWeb Constellation (as has at least one other Canadian company, Burnaby, BC based MacDonald Dettwiler). The closing of this business would certainly change the valuation of COM DEV.

As well, the access to the US market, provided through the Honeywell purchase would also increase the profitability of COM DEV, which recently closed a California-based subsidiary staffed with US security cleared personnel, for lack of work.

A quick, 60 second overview of the Investment Canada Act, from Omar Wakil, for the Canadian Bar Association. Screen grab and video c/o CBA.org.

Of course, any deal still requires the support of two-thirds of shareholders, who are expected to vote on the offer at the January 2016 COM DEV shareholders meeting. Only then will we find out what the investors think about the "enterprise value" of their investments.

But there are also national security provisions in the ICA.

These provisions, separate from the well understood "net benefit review" which has been in place since the 1980's, are far less well understood and have only been in place since 2009. Under the Stephen Harper government, there wasn't a lot of guidance or public discussion about how the provisions were enforced, and it's not likely that the current government will get up to speed in this area anytime soon.

Chuck Black.
For context, previous ICA reviews began the process which aborted the 2009 sale of Burnaby BC based MacDonald Dettwiler (MDA) to US based Alliant Techsystems (ATK) and halted the 2010 sale of the Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan to Anglo-Australian mining firm BHP Billiton, even after the shareholders had spoken.

So if you're opposed to the sale of an iconic Canadian company to a US multinational, this is a good a place as any to start.
___________________________________________________________

Chuck Black is the editor of the Commercial Space blog.

Monday, November 02, 2015

MDA CEO Dan Friedmann Didn't Threaten to Leave Canada Last Week!

          By Chuck Black

Once, it seemed like the quarterly MacDonald Dettwiler (MDA) investor conference calls simply weren't complete without one or two threats from MDA CEO Daniel E. Friedmann to move his company facilities out of Canada and into a country which promised to purchase more MDA products.

MDA CEO Friedmann. Photo c/o MDA.
Not any more.

These days, Friedmann is waxing positively poetic over the incoming Justin Trudeau Liberal government.

The October 29th, 2015 Seeking Alpha post, "MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates' (MDDWF) CEO Dan Friedmann on Q3 2015 Results - Earnings Call Transcript," which included a transcript of the latest October 28th, 2015 MDA Q3 earnings conference call, even quoted Friedmann as stating that:
All I can tell you is that in the run up to the election, the Liberals made positive statements with both respect to space and the defense part that we're interested in, because they spoke about a renewed focus on surveillance and control of the Canadian territory, in particular the Arctic which is what our two biggest space programs (the winding down RADARSAT Constellation mission and the upcoming, but so far unfunded Polar Communication and Weather mission) are centered on. 
They also spoke about developing a long-term strategy and so on. So they're the ones that were focused on that and I think we can remember that the last time the Liberals were in power, they were incredibly supportive of space and international partnerships and science and the country's space industry and MDA had a very, very thriving existence at that time in Canada. 
But that's just what's been said so far and what happened in the past. I have no basis to be able to tell you whether things are going to revive in 2016 or not. 
It is an emergency situation. I think the government is aware of that because a lot of work is winding down and capabilities being lost. So I think they're aware of the issues, but I don't know how they rank with respect to everything else they have to do.
All of which sounds highly positive, especially when compared with some of his other recent comments from previous quarterly conference calls, such as those outlined in the May 12th, 2015 post, "MacDonald Dettwiler, Sherlock Holmes and Why "Daddy" Might not Love Either."


However, as outlined in the October 29th, 2015 Space News article, "MDA Hoping to Ramp Up OneWeb Work in 2016," MDA isn't totally depending on the good graces of the incoming Liberals to shore up its Canadian base.

According to the article, MDA has also secured an unspecified contract with NewSpace start-up OneWeb Ltd. to develop satellite payload components for a constellation of approximately 900 proposed low orbiting satellites intended to provide global internet delivery to rural areas. Work is expected to take place in MDA's Montreal facilities, beginning in 2016. The Montreal facility is currently working on RADARSAT Constellation.

Of course, there are always caveats. According to the article, MDA's "new status as a member of the OneWeb Ltd. team – presumably in return for an equity investment that MDA has not disclosed – to date has resulted in no contracts for OneWeb’s 900 satellites."

“I wouldn’t characterize it as a contract,” Friedmann said of MDA’s OneWeb work. “We are working, we are getting paid but we don’t have a fixed-price contract. We’re just a member of the team. The program is proceeding toward defining what it is going to look like and still has to raise a couple of billion dollars, which we’re trying to help with."


The article also covered other MDA sales opportunities, the financing troubles its been having at its Space Systems Loral (SSL) subsidiary given the temporary closure of the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im), which normally guarantees funding for these sorts of projects (it's considered a short term political problem, at least as outlined by the October 29th, 2015 Air Transport World post "One man is keeping Ex-Im closed") and the assistance provided by Export Development Canada (EDC) in at least one instance, even though none of the funded SSL satellite construction work would occur in Canada.

But it's worth noting that investor support for MDA has reached a plateau over the last few months and the latest conference call hasn't changed that perception. For example, ScotiaBank has scaled back its expectations for MDA stock as outlined in the November 2nd, 2015 Dakota Financial News article "Scotiabank Cuts Macdonald Dettwiler & Associates Price Target to C$88.00 (MDA)" and other financial institutions are likely to soon follow suit.

Either the US Ex-Im needs to reopen or else OneWeb needs to raise a few billion more to fund its satellite constellation or else some other market is going to need to open up for MDA products and services.

Chuck Black.
If none of that happens over the next little while, MDA CEO Friedmann is going to need to start sucking up to the new Liberal government even more so than he did last week.

Yes, indeed! Mr. Prime Minister!
___________________________________________________________

Chuck Black is the editor of the Commercial Space blog.

Sunday, November 01, 2015

Commercial Spaceports and ‘Field of Dreams’ Business Models

          By Glen Strom

Commercial spaceports are popping up all over the United States, Europe and Asia. The latest one is at Ellington Airport in the Houston, Texas area, as per the October 29th, 2015 PR Newswire post, "NASA Partners With Houston Airport System In Development Of Spaceport."

The abandoned Fort Churchill rocket range in 2012. Anyone who thinks spaceports are a new concept doesn't know about Akjuit Aerospace and its plan to build one in northern Manitoba during the 1990's. As outlined in both the September 25th, 2014 Motherboard post, "The Failed Plan to Build a Commercial Spaceport in the Subarctic" and the March 1st, 2010 post "A Short History of Akjuit Aerospace," the company, initially backed by the well heeled Richardson Family of Manitoba, attempted to raise $300Mln CDN in order to provide surplus Soviet-era SS-25 ICBMs to the commercial market, but failed. Photo c/o Martin Lopatka/Flickr.

It’s not a bad idea for some. Eventually, sub-orbital tourism and scientific flights, as well as small satellite launches, will become a good business. But one thing seems to be missing from the plans for too many of these spaceports.

How will they make money until the spaceships show up? How many spaceports are being planned and built on a field-of-dreams business model?

Good movie. Bad business plan. Graphic c/o Universal.
In the 1989 movie “Field of Dreams,” Kevin Costner plays an Iowa farmer named Ray Kinsella. Ray is out in the field one day and hears a disembodied voice whisper, “If you build it he will come.” Ray cuts down the corn field and builds a baseball field. Soon, the field is populated by the ghosts of long dead major-league baseball players.

The movie, which has a heartwarming ending, was a big success.

But that’s the movies. Real-life ventures based on “If you build it he (they) will come” don’t usually work out as well. As an example of that, and potentially a business-school case study for what not to do, look at Spaceport America (SA). An October 26th, 2015 article at Popular Mechanics, “Welcome To the Ghost Town That Virgin Galactic Built,” tells the tale of unfulfilled expectations.

Located 32 km southeast of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico, SA was supposed to be the cutting edge of commercial space with Virgin Galactic (VG), the company run by flamboyant billionaire and part-time space-whisperer Richard Branson, as its signature tenant.

At this point success for SA remains firmly out of reach. The crash of VG’s SpaceShipTwo on October 31, 2014 in the Mohave desert and a promise of flights within 2 years of building the facility (that promise is now in its 10th year) has left SA without much to show for their commitment.

Spaceport America in 2015. Although not abandoned, as outlined in the October 26th, 2015 Popular Mechanics post, "Welcome To the Ghost Town That Virgin Galactic Built," the facility, once supposed to be the bustling home for private space activities, is currently "little more than a movie set." Photo c/o John Wenz.

Now, some of those politicians who listened to Mr. Branson’s corn-field whispers might be looking to get the spaceport off their hands, according to a February 23, 2015 article at Gizmag, “Could Virgin Galactic's Spaceport America be put up for sale?”

Ironically, in the article, New Mexico state Senator George Munoz, sponsor of the bill to sell SA, uses the “If we build it they will come” quote from the movie to describe the expectations of good times that haven’t materialized.

Spaceport America’s plight also gets a mention in an October 26th, 2015 article at The Space Review, “Looking back a year and a decade.” Most of the article is about other areas of commercial space, but SA gets their moment under the microscope near the end.


Christine Anderson, Chief Executive Officer of Spaceport America, says they are working to get new tenants while they wait for Virgin Galactic, but she doesn’t expect the facility to be financially self-sufficient until at least late 2017 or early 2018. That could be causing a serious pucker factor for the politicians because the next state election in New Mexico is in 2018.

Ms. Anderson is also quoted as saying they need to be resourceful and resilient in the face of these setbacks. Perhaps they wouldn’t need to be quite so resourceful and resilient if they hadn’t put together a field-of-dreams business model in the first place.

Without a business plan that will make money until the day comes when spaceships are flying, many of those spaceports may revert back to being corn fields, deserts, or whatever they were before.


Is there a defence against the dreaded field-of-dreams pitch? Yes there is, and it’s offered here free of charge to business people with dollar signs in their eyes, and politicians with votes in theirs.

If a space-whisperer has this fantastic idea of building an awesome spaceport that will bring in millions and make you a hero for life, ask one question: What’s the plan for making money until the spaceships finally come to the facility?

Glen Strom.
If the answer is “uh, great question,” smile, show them the door, and watch the movie “Field of Dreams.”

You’ll get the feel-good buzz you want for a lot less money and far less trouble.
_____________________________________________________

Glen Strom is a freelance writer and editor with a background in business and technical writing. Follow him on Twitter @stromspace for the latest on Canadian space stories.

Thursday, October 29, 2015

A New Advertorial and Sponsored Post Policy

          By Chuck Black

Some of what we can do. Graphic c/o blogkonversation. 
It's worth noting that most Commercial Space blog authors and contributors are professionals who write for money.

As such, we are often approached by organizations and/or individuals looking to create a sponsored post or advertorial to post on the blog or publish through another outlet.

It's just that, with one or two exceptions (such as the posts referencing the Space Library, the most recent of which was the October 4th, 2015 post "Rocket Spaceflight Accurately Described by Scottish-Canadian Scientist in 1861," where the blog receives a small commission on new Space Library subscribers), we don't normally accept advertorials or sponsored articles as blog posts.

And any exceptions are always noted and referenced in the post, just to be fair to our readers.

But we're OK with using our expertise in other areas where we can help promote your organization or services and are happy enough to take your money, given the correct opportunity. 

Below is a current listing of our offerings and standard rates.

For more information, to sign up, or to design a custom package suitable to your needs, please contact Chuck Black at mr.chuck.black@gmail.com. 

Generate Thought Leadership

Type of Work
Starting Rate
Description of Work
Standard Press Releases
$360 for 250 word press release
An approximately 250 word press release in a standard format on company letterhead suitable for distribution to press and wire services.
Bylined Articles
$500 for 500 word article.

$1 per additional word
An approximately 500 word bylined article by a Commercial Space blog author in electronic format suitable for publication. Includes appropriate phone interviews and appropriate research.
Case Studies
$1500 for 1000 word case study

 $1.50 per additional word
An approximately 1000 word case study suitable for publication. Includes phone interviews and appropriate research.
White Papers
$6000 for 3000 word white paper

$2 per additional word
An approximately 3000 word white paper suitable for publication. Includes phone interviews and appropriate research.
Consulting
$120 per hour standard fee
Strategy, recommendations and the development of specific campaigns around defined needs.
Public Speaking
Starting at $500 per event
Commercial Space blog authors are available to make presentations. Connect to confirm availability.
Copy Editing
$75 per 500 words
Copy editing, spelling and grammar correction.
Other
Let’s Talk
Brochures, corporate documents, web-site content or development and/or lead generation services are also available. Call for more information.


Create Your Own Electronic Newsletter

Type of Work
Starting Rate
Description of Work
Initial Set-up Fees
$3000
Includes developing the primary electronic layout and using client records to develop the initial e-mail list
Monthly Ongoing Costs
$1440 monthly
Ongoing monthly layout and e-mail list maintenance plus basic content development and curation / re-purposing from existing sources. Based on a list of up to 5,000 names.
Custom Content Development
$1 per word
Standard rate. For additional pricing, check out our Generate Thought Leadership chart or give us a call.


Increase Your Visibility with our Targeted E-mails

Type of Work
Starting Rate
Description of Work
A dedicated e-mail sent out to Commercial Space blog readers
$1000 per e-mail
We'll send out mutually agreed upon content in a dedicated e-mail to our Commercial Space blog list of over 2000 validated e-mail addresses belonging to science, engineering, mathematics and business professionals in industry, government and academia working to create and commercialize the next generation of Canadian based manufacturing, aerospace and space technology.
A 2nd e-mail sent out to 5000 newsrooms throughout North America
$5000 per e-mail
We'll send out content to all 5000 contact names on our dedicated media outlet list, most of whom aren’t included on the standard weekly e-mail list. Many of these contacts are generated though the Sources List of Media Names and Numbers but the list also includes a substantial number of US and European based news outlets.
Ongoing follow-up for e-mail distribution
Starting at $10,000
A targeted campaign consisting of multiple follow-up e-mails and phone calls to the newsroom list to enhance your outreach by encouraging media to run the articles, and to extend your coverage via follow-up interviews.

Chuck Black.
___________________________________________________________

Chuck Black is the editor of the Commercial Space blog.

Tuesday, October 27, 2015

What About all those Cheap Rockets and Spacecraft?

          By Brian Orlotti

As the dust settles from the recent federal election and the public awaits the Trudeau government's unveiling of its space policy, it is timely to examine a key question facing Canada's space sector: that of Canada acquiring its own space launch capability.

It not as if Canada doesn't build its own rockets. Seen above is the September 19th, 2009 launch of the NASA Black Brant XII / CARE rocket from Wallops Island, Virginia. The Black Brant is a family of Canadian-designed sounding rockets built by Bristol Aerospace in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Over 800 Black Brants of various versions have been launched since they were first produced in 1961, and the type remains one of the most popular sounding rockets ever built. Screenshot c/o NASA.

On October 16, the National Research Council published a contract tender, under the title "Advance Contract Award Notice – 15-22108 – International Spacecraft Consultant (15-22108)," for an "international spacecraft consultant." The tender, open only for a very short two week period and scheduled to close on Friday, October 30th, contains key wording which includes:
The consultant will be responsible for the provision of technical support including advice and review of spacecraft related activity for the Aerospace Portfolio of the National Research Council Canada...
This expertise will primarily be applied to mechanical systems of spacecraft programs including spacecraft design and development, interfaces to launch vehicles and launch vehicle environment on the spacecraft design.
For decades, the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) has claimed Canada doesn't want or need its own space launch capability, yet other elements of the federal government appear receptive to the idea.

As recently as June of this year, at the 2015 International Space Development Conference (ISDC2015), which was held from May 20th - 24th in Toronto, Ontario, former astronaut, CSA president and current member of parliament for Westmount—Ville-Marie, Marc Garneau publicly spoke out against a Canadian microsat launch vehicle. With rumours circulating of the creation of a new federal Science/Technology ministry with a mandate and budget that could dwarf the CSA's and with Garneau speculated to be anointed its leader, would his stance change? Screenshot c/o CSCA.

For decades, the CSA's main justification for not pursuing a home-grown Canadian space launch capability has been cost. The CSA has repeatedly claimed that the cost of a Canadian space launch vehicle would be far beyond its resources, costing in the hundreds of millions. This attitude is both politically and technologically tone-deaf, utterly ignoring the rise of the NewSpace industry and the advent of more cost-effective space technologies both in the US and around the world.

Even NASA is jumping on the bandwagon.

As outlined in the October 16th, 2015 SpaceFlight Now article, "NASA to fly CubeSats on three new commercial launchers," the US space agency has announced its awarding of $17.1Mln USD ($22.67Mln CDN) in contracts (as part of its venture class launch services program) to three firms developing new low-cost (less than $10Mln USD apiece) rockets designed to lift lightweight cube-sats into orbit.


One of these firms, New Zealand-based Rocket Lab Inc., has pioneered the use of 3D-printing and use of carbon composites in both the structure and engine of its 'Electron' rocket to reduce its price to a very competitive $5Mln USD ($6.63Mln CDN).

Rocket Lab also recently signed a contract with Moon Express, a California-based firm competing for the Google Lunar X-Prize, to launch its robotic lunar landers on Electron rockets, with the first launch scheduled for 2017.

"Bureaucracy destroys initiative. There is little that bureaucrats hate more than innovation, especially innovation that produces better results than the old routines. Improvements always make those at the top of the heap look inept. Who enjoys appearing inept?" Frank Herbert, Heretics of Dune.

It is a well-worn cliche that post-election periods are times of hope and great expectations. Despite this, the opportunity for genuine change is real. Canada now has the chance to uproot its timid, out-of-touch space bureaucracy and walk a bolder path.

The new government could lead the charge or it could step out of the way and let the private sector do what we now know is possible. Perhaps, if the CSA or some other government agency wanted to launch something, they'd even consider a potential Canadian supplier.

Brian Orlotti.
Either path would let Canadians honour a rightly proud past and build a future that remains so.
______________________________________________________________

Brian Orlotti is a network operations centre analyst at Shomi, a Canadian provider of on-demand internet streaming media and a regular contributor to the Commercial Space blog.

Support our Patreon Page